If Job Seekers Can Be Flexible, Why Cant Employers

If Job Seekers Can Be Flexible, Why Cant EmployersIf Job Seekers Can Be Flexible, Why Cant Employers?If Job Seekers Can Be Flexible, Why Cant EmployersHeres a good discussion launcher If workers need to be flexible in their jobs and when they get laid off and look for new jobs, why cant employers show similar flexibility when they need to fill a position or hang onto someone who might look for something better after, say, a year?I pondered that question after I read a recent CNNMoney.com article about job postings that say unemployed applicants would bedrngnis be considered.Yes, when youre jobless and sending dozens of resumes, most of which fail to land interviews, it sometimes seems as if no one will cut you a break. And then you see this tactless statement in a job posting that drives home the point rather bluntly. Thats like saying So, your old company kicked you into the gutter? Tsk Tsk Heres another kick Stay in that gutter and like itWhat are some of the lame excuses companies hide behind in rejecting the jobless? The article cites behauptung two gemsIf youre unemployed, there must have been something wrong with your performance.I can hear the chorus of What??? among those who were pink-slipped because of their companys performance problems, not their own.In this economy, employers get too many applications, so they have to find some shortcuts to end up with a more manageable list.Hmmm, how about eliminating resumes from anyone with the letter K, L, M, N, or O in their last names? That makes about as much sense.But heres another reason, which was not cited in the article, that we hear a lot todayThe job would be a lateral move or a step down, so if they hire an unemployed candidate, he or she will bolt after the economy improves and something better comes along.Some will find that logical, but I believe it signals a companys inflexibility. If an employer winds up with a star performer who has taken a step down after being laid off from a previous job, wo uldnt it make sense to find a way to keep that person? Or, if a highly experienced person applies for a lower-level job, and the company knows it can benefit from the job seekers experience, why not tinker with the job requirements to move them closer to that level of expertise?Thats how an employer can be more flexible, and more of them should be in this economy.